Info

You are currently browsing the archives for the Brain Candy category.

September 2008
S M T W T F S
« Aug    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Archive for the Brain Candy Category

DNA Testing

Ever wonder what your genetic makeup is? When you heard about the human genome project, did your mouth salivate at the thought of one day being able to know everything about your own DNA?

Okay, I admit I’m quirky, but yes, I am one of those people endlessly intrigued by this topic. Patiently, I have waited wondering when this technology will be brought to the general population. When I too can know every fact about my genetic composition.

Finally, the most recent issue of Discover magazine profiles three DNA “home kits.” The next time I win Lotto or have $1,000 laying around, I will be contacting 23andme straight away (the least expensive of the three alternatives).

So, I’ll find out irrefutably that I’m nuts. It’s not like it will be earth-shattering news. I just wonder how long before they find the Orioles gene — you know, the one that makes you vulnerable to being a fan even when it causes great personal suffering. That just can’t be an evolutionary advantage.

Epigenetics

Happy Labor Day weekend!!!

I hope yours is off to a wonderful start! Here is some great news to get your weekend off right. We’re very close to beating death forever. That will mean, of course, that some of you will have to go. If I’m going to have enough food to last me for the rest of eternity, there are far too many of us to share the earth. Take comfort though, dear reader, that if you continue to be a loyal reader, I will save you too. Maybe not all your kin, but if your family is like most, you’re probably okay with that. (Also, my Orioles friends will be saved. I can’t suffer more centuries of the Os losing alone, can I?)

Here is the Nova Science Now episode on epigenetics. Fascinating and very encouraging stuff!! Any day now someone will fix my jimmy legs. Any day now…

May we, all three of us, live peaceably together during our long future journey on this beautiful planet.

Vacation Idea: Icehotel

Bored with the usual vacation, staying in an ordinary hotel with walls made from stone, chairs made from wood and fabric, chandeliers made from glass and crystal? How about staying in the Swedish Icehotel? It’s a hotel made entirely of ice.

“If it is possible to build a hotel of ice in a small village 200km inside the Arctic Circle, which strikes the whole world with amazement, then anything is possible. The story of ICEHOTEL is indeed a fairy tale come true. The free flowing Torne River is the origin and artery of ICEHOTEL. From the river, the ice of ICEHOTEL is borrowed each year. And it is here, on the river shores in the village of Jukkasjärvi that our story begins.”

Learn more here.

Family Garden

Want an idea to keep the kids out of your hair on the weekend, teach them planning skills, and reduce your food bill? How about starting a family garden? What’s better tasting and more nutritious than home grown veggies. Don’t worry about your kids participating. According to the American Horticultural Society, you can get your kids to cooperate better when they’re involved in the decision making:

“Children will engage in learning more readily when given responsibility for decision making and planning. So says the results of a three year study entitled “Greener Voices.”

Sure, it may be too late to start seeds from scratch, but you can always buy your tomato plants from a nursery or store like Lowes or Home Depot. Maybe it would be a nice way to celebrate Father’s Day by creating something together, and certainly an experience your children will always remember.

Resources:
Children’s Gardens Growing
Garden Based Learning Activities
Learning about Gardening
Natural Ways to Reduce Pests
Top Uses for Coffee Grounds
21 Uses for Coffee Grounds

Power of No

In a world where parents are overstressed and struggling to keep up with their many responsibilities, it is sometimes hard to say, “No” to their children. Who feels like arguing after a hard day’s work! Here is a great explanation from Rabbi Shmuley Boteach about how saying, “No” to your children is one of the best things you can do for their development.

Sex in the City

All across America, women are writing the same blog entry about the premiere of “Sex in the City.” It starts with, “All across America, women and their girlfriends dressed up for a girl’s night out.” Much of the content of these entries will be similar, but only one will say that somewhere in Charlotte, a lone Orioles fan had to set her DVR to record a tied game in the seventh inning against the Boston Red Sox so that she could attend the “Sex in the City” event with her girlfriends. Hopefully, you’ve guessed that that lone Orioles fan was me.

A big fan of the series when it was on, I’ve been looking forward to the movie ever since the last episode aired. Last night, as my girlfriends and I did what many women did, dressed up, consumed cocktails, and eagerly attended the movie, I felt like I was witnessing a part of history. I’ve never been part of the frenzy of any other movie opening, never purchased tickets in advance or slept on a sidewalk to save my place in line, so this was a unique taste of what I’ve seen some of my friends do to attend the movie opening of “Star Wars” or some comic book hero, except in a less-geeky, fashionable sort of way. I’m sure in the history of cinema, there has never been such a large gathering of predominately women at a movie. Girlfriends used the movie as an excuse for an evening of bonding. At least seventy percent of the women I saw were dressed up, and some made an extravagant night of it by renting a limo, two of which were lined up in front of the theatre.

We envy and admire the characters from “Sex in the City.” We all want girlfriends who are close to us like those characters are to each other, friends who are supportive and available no matter what is happening in our lives, or more importantly, in theirs. Those of us who don’t live in New York City live in a world of urban sprawl where we’re spread out from our family and friends, further exacerbating the problem of how to have regular social interaction in our already time-crunched society. In our busy world, it’s hard to find time to get together once a month, let alone once a week. Even if we could allocate an hour a week or every day, we’re not set up so that we’re able to just pop down to the coffee shop a mile down the road. Any outing to gather our favorite people involves distance and requires at least a portion of an evening unless we all happen to live in the same neighborhood.

Another thing that’s unique about the characters in “Sex in the City” is that they each represent a different experience of being a woman, each with her own sensibilities, ranging the spectrum of cynical to innocent, liberal to traditonal, and yet despite their differences are still able to connect and appreciate each other for who they are. Don’t we all want accepting friends like that, who can tolerate our differences instead of pulling out the magnifying glass and focusing on what they perceive as our flaws.

“Which one are you?” one of our girlfriends asked last night. We all claimed to be Charlotte. Either it’s who we think we are inside or who we most want to be. Only one of us admitted to being wholly Samantha, though again, wished she were more Charlotte. I, myself, have identified with all the characters at one time or another, each representing how I’ve felt or acted during different chapters in my life, the distinction of which I will leave for your imagination.

I have mixed feelings about the movie. I can’t explain why, but perhaps it was because it was a different experience watching the four women on the big screen than in the intimacy of my living room. Watching a movie in a theatre has its own charms and some of what I loved best about being at the premiere was sharing in a few moments that one can only have as part of a theatre audience. I love noting how an audience responds to different scenes, particularly this one in which the audience was uniquely, almost entirely female. At a couple of scenes that must have typified a male perspective, we could hear the distinctly deep laugh from any of the five men in the audience.

Nothing was better than hearing the start of the theme music at the beginning of the movie. During the series, each week those cheerful notes signaled the beginning of forty minutes of some of my favorite television ever. Like hearing “Thank God I’m a Country Boy” or a certain part of “The National Anthem,” like any music that takes us instantly back to special moments in our lives, the theme music to “Sex in the City” elicits a subtle feeling of happiness in me, an “Oooo.” I’m obviously not alone in this because as soon as the theme music started, the entire theatre audience applauded enthusiastically. We also applauded at the end, in appreciation of a long-awaited movie and at a few “You tell ‘em girl” scenes in between. Those are the moments you can’t have in the privacy of your living room, the feeling that you’re part of a shared cultural experience.

All the actresses were gorgeous, as usual, but most especially Sarah Jessica Parker who is beautiful with an enviable muscular body despite what some may say in the most uncharitable and unkind magazine, to whom I won’t give further credit by naming. The plot of the movie managed to remain light, largely humorous throughout despite the adversity that follows a few characters for the duration. Though I enjoyed it, the movie somehow lacked the poignancy of the series. I was expecting at least one scene to move me the way the series did, something akin to my favorite scene from the entire six seasons when Harry finds Charlotte at synagogue and proposes. Perhaps I’ll think differently when I watch the movie again on DVD, in the quiet of my home without other distractions.

Last night was as much about female bonding as it was about seeing the movie. We counted only five men walking out of our viewing that ended at 1:30 a.m. I will certainly be making more of an effort to bond with one of the women in our group. She casually mentioned that one of the Bunko friends from her neighborhood is the sister of Jason Lewis. Guess where I hope to be hanging out come the holidays when families gather together from across the country. Maybe someone from Hollywood will be my ticket to a dinner with Cal and Brooks. I can hope, can’t I?

Juno Quote

“Look, in my opinion the best thing you can do is find a person who loves you for exactly what you are. Good mood, bad mood, ugly, pretty, handsome, what-have-you, the right person is still going to think the sun shines out of your ass.” ~Juno

Here’s hoping that your Friday is full of people who think the sun shines out of your tushy.

Freakonomics

If Freakonomics has one central theme, it’s about information, how one statistician uses statistics to examine every day sorts of questions, finding patterns and teasing out the truth about what influences outcomes and what doesn’t.

Freakonomics discusses one of the most important inventions that leveled the marketplace for consumers: the Internet. As the market is largely driven by an uneven distribution of knowledge, when consumers are informed about choices, about competing products, about how an industry works, about profit margins, the power dynamic shifts.

“Information is a beacon, a cudgel, an olive branch, a deterrent, depending on who wields it and how. Information is so powerful that the assumption of information, even if the information does not actually exist, can have a sobering effect…Information is the currency of the Internet. As a medium, the Internet is brilliantly efficient at shifting information from the hands of those who have it into the hands of those who do not…Just as Stetson Kennedy accomplished what no journalist, do-gooder, or prosecutor could: it has vastly shrunk the gap between the experts and the public.”

The Internet has proven particularly fruitful for situations in which face-to-face encounter with an expert might actuarly exacerbate the problem of asymmetrical information–situations in which an expert uses his informational advantage to make us feel stupid or rushed or cheap or ignoble…

Experts depend on the fact that you don’t have the information they do. Or that you are so befuddled by the complexity of their operation that you wouldn’t know what to do with the information if you had it. Or that you are so in awe of their expertise that you wouldn’t dare challenge them…

Armed with information, experts can exert a gigantic, if unspoken, leverage: fear. Fear that your children will find you dead on the bathroom floor of a heart attack if you do not have angioplasty surgery. Fear that a cheap casket will expose your grandmother to a terrible underground fate. Feat that a $25,000 car will crumple like a a toy in an accident, whereas a $50,000 car will wrap your loved ones in a cocoon of impregnable steel. The fear created by commercial experts may not quite rival the fear created by terrorists like the Ku Klux Klan, but hte principle is the same.”

Here’s some more information that Freakonomics provides:

    Real-estate agents–When real estate agents sell their own homes, they keep their house on the market longer and get better offers, selling it for more than 3% more than they get for their clients. Consider that when an agent is selling a client’s house she’ll get an average of $150 extra for every additional $10,000 on the sales price. Since the difference in sales price has little impact on the agent’s commission, she has more incentive to encourage you to sell as soon as possible.



    What’s more is that the terms used in the sales ad influence the sales price. Beware terms like “fantastic,” “spacious,” “charming,” or “great neighborhood.” Or even an exclamation mark! Those five words correlated with a lower sales price. The ads for the agents own homes omitted those words or other vague adjectives, instead including descriptive words like “granite” and “move-in condition.”
    Discrimination–In the show, “The Weakest Link” the contestants who suffered the greatest discrimination and were the quickest to be eliminated were Hispanics and the elderly, disproportionately to their skills.



The authors of Freakonomics answer more interesting questions about our society:

    Crime–What caused a precipitous drop in crime in the nineties? Was it the efforts of law enforcement, stiffer crime laws, efforts at reducing drug crimes? Actually, it was none of those!
    Parenting–How much does your parenting matter? Does it matter how much television your children watch? Whether mom stays home until kindergarten? Whether the child attended Head Start? Whether the children are read to or taken to museums? You will be surprised by what actually matters and what doesn’t and how little the actual truth matches the folk wisdom.
    Names–Does the name you give your child correlate with how well he’ll do in life and whether he will succeed? I’m sure you’ve heard of Baby Naming Consultants. Are they worth the money?

I’ll leave the rest of the book a mystery for you to discover.

Heros: Stetson Kennedy

In the mid-1940’s, frustrated with growing bigotry, Stetson Kennedy set out on a mission to dismantle the Ku Klux Klan. Kennedy, posing as a fellow racist, joined the Klan with hopes that, in figuring out how they operated, he might find a way to destroy them. He largely succeeded and is attributed with making the Klan impotent and preventing a post-war Klan revival.

One person can make a difference, and in the case of Kennedy, a remarkable one in changing the course of history and the fate of a nation.

Creating positive change takes courage, imagination, and determination, and what we’ve learned from Kennedy, is to be undaunted by the size of the job. While the mission for change may seem insurmountable, and we too small to tackle it, we must remember all the examples of history that have proven how much difference one person can make. How often the whistle-blower, the sole individual with courage to speak up among a sea of participants who further enabled that which they knew to be wrong, that one intrepid person of integrity and character, unraveled a tangled plot of deliberate, intentional, and destructive misconduct. Conversely, one self-serving individual, one man consumed with pursuing the desires of his inflated ego unchecked causes irreparable damage.

Information and disclosure are the tools that protect us. Often the answer to change can be as “simple” as revealing that which the power structure wants to remain hidden, that which happens behind closed doors, or as in the case of the Klan, the cowardly and ugly that lay hidden beneath their bed linens.

The Klan’s source of power came from their secrecy. When Stetson revealed the Klan’s secret codes and passwords, he removed all their allure and power. We have too many examples from recent years showing us the harm that is done by secret societies. Politics, Enrons in the stock market, a war, the pharmaceutical industry, sub-prime loans. Too many examples of a few profiting at the cost of many. We should regard authority with the same eye as the hippies of the 60s. It is not disrespectful to question. It is disrespectful and, yes, immoral, for those in positions of authority to introduce red herrings that cut-off dialogue with distracting arguments about patriotism. (We are fools for falling for it.) Those who have nothing to hide are not afraid of discussions and disclosure.

Even in our personal lives, we see the negative effects of secrecy. Our employers threaten disciplinary action if we disclose our salary to a coworker. Who profits? We, as employees? No, we stab in the dark when we timidly ask for a raise, not knowing how much the person in the next cube with a similar, or inferior, skill set is making. The lack of information about salary ranges leaves us on shaky ground, never knowing for sure if we’re being fairly compensated. Our employer is completely at his own discretion to make things equitable, with a whole arsenal of rationalizations about shareholders and “the good of the company” to allay any self-doubt, protected as he is from ever owning up to any unfairness, encouraged to give as little as possible.

To some extent our economy is built upon a foundation of secrecy. We have a cultural taboo about speaking too directly about money. We don’t feel comfortable sharing our salary or bank balance. We solve this by consuming lots of things so that we can say through them that we’re doing “okay,” okay always defined as and measured by our material possessions, not by our charitable acts, volunteerism, leisure activities, vacation time, or how happy we are. If we’re keeping up with the Joneses, no one has to know the staggering, crushing debt we’ve accumulated. Sales are made by tightly guarding the amount of profit made on the good or service. Whether it be a negotiation for a car or a consulting service, the person in power is the one who has the most information.

Information and disclosure keep our democracy intact and people safe. As Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner state in their book, “Freakonomics,” those who control the flow of information control everything.

Read Levitt and Dubner’s account of Stetson Kennedy here and more about Freakonomics in my next post.

Entertainment Recommendations

Tomorrow night, PBS will air the Frontline episode Storm Over Everest created by David Breashears. The film is about the 1996 expedition to Mount Everest that resulted in the death of many climbers, portrayed from a slightly different perspective than Krakauer’s gripping account “Into Thin Air.” If you’ve never read or listened to Krakauer’s book, I highly recommend it. (I borrowed the audio book years ago and listened to it twice it was so good!) The Frontline special promises to be interesting as well. I’m interested to see the interview with Beck Weathers (what a fortuitous name) who was left for dead twice and miraculously awoke and stumbled his way back to camp.

In the way of entertainment, I also want to reiterate what an extraordinary life-improving invention Itunes is. Let’s say you want to find some podcasts on Roman History or human-computer interaction, or even, incredibly enough, learn tennis, it’s ALL there! Even Cal Ripken and Roch Kubatko have podcasts, or rather had, as they don’t seem to work now (nor does the Orioles Report). Of course, there’s all the NPR and PBS podcasts too. Maybe one day all universities will have their lectures podcast. Free learning!

Life is good!